SBScientific Baking The cited reference library
Search the library /
About & methodology

Professional · Article 24

Nutrition & Grain Science

A reference article · 3,600 words · 90 cited sources · last reviewed October 2026 · fact-checked October 2026, 58 claims

The nutrition of bread comes down to three physical facts: which fractions of the kernel survive milling, how finely the grain is ground, and how the dough is fermented. Get those right and you have done more than any additive can.

Health claims here are stated as evidence, not advocacy, and every contested claim carries an explicit grade. The consolidated ledger at the foot of the article is the honest summary.

The kernel, and what milling takes

A cereal grain is botanically a caryopsis, a single-seeded dry fruit whose seed coat is fused to the fruit wall (McGee, 2004). Every grain is organised into three tissues, and baking nutrition starts with knowing what each carries.

The three fractions of a cereal kernel
Share of kernel mass, and what each fraction holds
13–17%
Bran. Fibre, most B-vitamins, minerals, phenolics, and the phytic acid
2–3%
Germ. The embryo. Oils, vitamin E, folate, high-quality protein
80–85%
Endosperm. Starch and the storage proteins. This is white flour
Proportions per McGee, On Food and Cooking (2004) and Brouns et al. (2012).

The bran is a multilayered outer shell: pericarp, testa, and the aleurone layer, which is botanically the outermost cell layer of the endosperm but leaves with the bran during milling (Brouns et al., 2012). It concentrates insoluble fibre, the majority of the kernel’s B-vitamins, its minerals, and its phytochemicals (Meziani et al., 2021; Tian et al., 2022). Wheat bran is one of the richest dietary sources of ferulic acid (Boz, 2015). The aleurone also holds most of the kernel’s phytic acid and a substantial share of its phytase, the enzyme that breaks phytic acid down; phytase activity peaks in the outer, aleurone-rich layers (Mayer et al., 2023), although an older estimate puts only about 40% of the total there, with most of the rest in the endosperm (Peers, 1953, via Mayer et al., 2023). That pairing becomes the whole fermentation story below.

The germ is the embryo, the living part that would become a plant. Small in mass but dense in nutrition, it carries polyunsaturated oils, vitamin E, folate, additional B-vitamins, and high-quality protein. Wheat germ is roughly 10% oil, largely linoleic acid, which is the source of both its value and its instability (Ghafoor et al., 2017).

The endosperm is the seed’s starch-and-protein food store, overwhelmingly starch plus the gliadins and glutenins that hydrate into gluten. It is comparatively poor in fibre, vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals, because those live in the two fractions milling removes (Slavin et al., 2001).

The implication is direct: the most nutrient-dense parts of the grain are exactly the parts refining takes out, and what remains is mostly digestible starch.

Extraction rate is the master variable

Extraction rate is the percentage of the grain, by weight, that ends up in the flour. A 100% extraction flour is whole grain. Typical white bread flour runs roughly 72 to 75% extraction, meaning the 25 to 28% removed is the bran and germ plus some endosperm that clings to them, since no mill recovers all of the 80 to 85% the endosperm makes up (Doblado-Maldonado et al., 2012). High-extraction or half-white flours, roughly 80 to 90% (definitions vary, and some start lower), sit in between, keeping more nutrition at some cost to lift and crumb colour.

Roller milling passes grain through successive pairs of corrugated then smooth steel rollers, sifting between stages. Its defining capability is separation: it cleanly shears endosperm away from bran and germ, letting the miller produce pure white flour and divert the germ oil out of the flour stream entirely (Jones et al., 2015). That is a commercial triumph, white flour of consistent quality with long shelf life, and a nutritional subtraction.

Stone milling crushes the whole kernel between two stones. It does not cleanly separate anything, so the germ and its oil are crushed into the flour. Whole stone-ground flour therefore keeps the germ, its oil, vitamin E, and folate, and generally carries more flavour (Cappelli et al., 2020; Myhrvold & Migoya, 2017).

Contested

The marketing claim that stone-ground flour is categorically more nutritious does not survive the milling literature, and neither does the tidy counter-claim. For whole flour, the grinding method makes little compositional difference: Carcea et al. (2019) found no meaningful difference between stone-milled and recombined roller-milled whole flour, and Jones et al. (2015) found nutrient retention as good or better with rollers, whose stream separation lets the miller stabilise the germ before returning it. For sifted flours stone milling often comes out ahead. Cappelli et al. (2020), in a systematic review, list higher mineral and polyphenol content as a stone-milling advantage, and Pradhan et al. (2026) measured stone-milled refined flour at roughly 0.95% ash and 10.6% fibre against 0.56% and 6.9% for roller-milled refined flour. Extraction rates were not matched in that comparison, so it mostly reflects how much bran and germ each flour kept. The real variable is what fraction of the kernel is kept, not the grinding mechanism.

Stone milling also generates more frictional heat, which can degrade heat-sensitive nutrients and accelerate oil oxidation (Doblado-Maldonado et al., 2012). Whole flour of either kind goes rancid faster than white flour, with a shelf life under half that of refined flour, because it keeps the germ and bran lipids together with their lipase and lipoxygenase (Wei et al., 2021); stone milling adds heat damage to the oil on top.

What “whole grain” actually means

The operative definition requires that bran, germ, and endosperm be present in the same relative proportions as they exist in the intact kernel (AACC International, 1999; Whole Grains Council, 2004). Processing is allowed. A grain can be cracked, rolled, extruded, cooked, or milled into flour, provided the three fractions survive together in their original ratio (Mathews & Chu, 2020).

That reconstitution rule is what lets whole-wheat flour count despite being pulverised, and it is what makes label reading hard. “Multigrain,” “stone-ground,” “wheat flour,” and “made with whole grains” do not guarantee whole grain, and brown colouring is frequently caramel colour or molasses. The reliable signals are “100% whole grain” and a whole grain as the first ingredient (Whole Grains Council, 2004).

The evidence on whole versus refined

The epidemiological case is among the more consistent in nutrition science. The landmark dose-response meta-analysis of 45 prospective studies found that each additional 90 g per day of whole grains, about three servings, was associated with the following reductions in risk (Aune et al., 2016).

Risk reduction per 90 g/day of whole grains
Dose-response meta-analysis of 45 prospective studies
0% 10% 20% 30%Infectious-disease mortality26% lowerCardiovascular disease22% lowerRespiratory-disease mortality22% lowerCoronary heart disease19% lowerAll-cause mortality17% lowerTotal cancer mortality15% lower
Infectious-disease mortality26% lower
Cardiovascular disease22% lower
Respiratory-disease mortality22% lower
Coronary heart disease19% lower
All-cause mortality17% lower
Total cancer mortality15% lower
Aune et al., BMJ (2016). Risk reductions were observed up to roughly 210–225 g/day, the top of the intake range studied, with the steepest gains at low intakes. The infectious-disease estimate rests on three studies.

Later work commissioned by the WHO reinforced that higher intakes of fibre and whole grains track with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer, in a graded fashion (Reynolds et al., 2019). For type 2 diabetes specifically, cohorts consistently associate higher whole-grain intake with roughly 20 to 30% lower incidence comparing high to low consumers (Aune et al., 2013; Ghanbari-Gohari et al., 2022).

The epistemic caveat

This evidence is overwhelmingly observational. Whole-grain eaters tend to be more health-conscious in general, which is residual confounding, and randomised trials, which mostly measure intermediate markers over weeks, show more modest and sometimes mixed effects than the cohort associations imply (Kelly et al., 2017).

The consensus judgment: the association is real and partly causal, plausible through fibre, lower glycemic response, minerals, and phytochemicals. But the magnitude from cohort studies likely overstates the pure grain effect. Association strong; precise causal magnitude moderate.

Four mechanisms plausibly underlie the benefit. Fibre, both insoluble for bulk and transit, and soluble and fermentable, arabinoxylan and beta-glucan, feeding gut microbiota to yield short-chain fatty acids linked to insulin sensitivity and satiety. Micronutrients, particularly magnesium, itself inversely associated with diabetes (Fang et al., 2016), plus zinc, selenium, and B-vitamins (Slavin et al., 2001). Phytochemicals, including ferulic acid and other phenolics, lignans, alkylresorcinols, and phytosterols (Tian et al., 2022). And glycemic response, where physical structure turns out to matter more than the label.

Why particle size decides the glycemic story

Intact and coarsely processed whole grains blunt the postprandial glucose and insulin spike relative to finely milled refined starch. Heaton et al. (1988) showed insulin responses rising stepwise from whole grains to cracked grains to coarse flour to fine flour, and randomised crossover trials in people with type 2 diabetes confirm that less-processed whole grains lower postprandial glycemia (Åberg et al., 2020; Reynolds et al., 2020). For wheat and maize, whole kernels and coarse or cracked grinds digest more slowly than fine flour (Heaton et al., 1988), though Heaton found little difference between oat groats, rolled oats and fine oatmeal; stone-ground flour is the weakest item on that list, since one trial found no glycemic difference between fine and coarse stone-ground bread (Mete et al., 2021).

Finely milled whole-wheat flour, however, has a glycemic index nearly as high as white flour, because grinding destroys the intact cell walls that slow starch access (Edwards et al., 2015). White bread sits around GI 70 to 75, and many finely milled whole-wheat breads are similar: the international tables put whole-wheat bread at 74 against 75 for white (Atkinson et al., 2008; Musa-Veloso et al., 2018).

Routinely oversimplified

Whole grain delivers its full glycemic benefit only when particle size stays large. It is the intactness, not the whole-grain label, that lowers glycemic index. This is one of the most persistent misconceptions in health messaging about bread.

A second one worth flagging: fat and sugar-rich baked goods can show a deceptively moderate glycemic index because fat slows digestion, even though they are calorically dense (Englyst et al., 2003; Atkinson et al., 2008). Glycemic index is not a proxy for healthy.

Three levers lower it: intact or coarse structure, soluble viscous fibre such as beta-glucan from oats and barley, and, more weakly and less consistently, acidity from sourdough.

The baking tension

Whole-grain baking is genuinely harder, for reasons rooted in the same fractions that carry the nutrition.

Bran lowers loaf volume and densifies the crumb. That outcome is settled (Hemdane et al., 2016); the mechanism is not, and the “tiny blades” image is only one of the candidates. Bran and fibre compete for water, since arabinoxylans absorb a great deal, so whole-grain doughs need higher hydration and an under-hydrated one is stiff and tears (Hemdane et al., 2016). The germ’s oil and its own chemistry bring rancidity risk, through lipase and lipoxygenase, and germ weakens dough mainly through glutathione, a small tripeptide that cleaves gluten’s disulfide bonds (Marti et al., 2014). And phenolic acids such as ferulic acid, when free in the dough, can further interfere with rheology and reduce dough strength (Han & Koh, 2011); in bran itself most ferulic acid is bound to arabinoxylan.

Contested

What bran actually does to gluten. The long-standing explanation is mechanical: sharp bran particles cut the developing network and puncture gas cells, and Han et al. (2019) did image protein fibrils thinning and breaking around bran particles. But Noort et al. (2010) found that finer bran, which should be less sharp, was more damaging, and concluded that chemical fibre–gluten interactions rather than piercing are the main cause; Renzetti et al. (2021) found inert beads of bran-like size gave near-normal bread. The honest statement is that bran acts through several routes at once, dilution, water competition, steric hindrance, and fibre–protein binding, and no single one is "the" mechanism.

Bakers mitigate with soaking or autolyse, hydrating the bran before mixing so it no longer competes with gluten for water, higher hydration, longer and gentler mixing, added vital wheat gluten, and fermentation, which softens bran and improves texture and nutrition at the same time (Hemdane et al., 2016). The tension is real: maximum nutrition and maximum lightness pull in opposite directions, and most artisan practice is a negotiated middle.

What fermentation actually does

Phytate degradation is the strongest claim, and it is genuinely strong. Whole grains are rich in phytic acid, which chelates iron, zinc, magnesium, and calcium in the gut and inhibits their absorption (Schlemmer et al., 2009). This is why whole-grain diets, despite higher mineral content, can deliver lower mineral availability. Grains also carry phytase, concentrated in the aleurone, and wheat phytase has a pH optimum in the mildly acidic range, roughly 5.0 to 5.5, with individual isozymes peaking up to about 6.0 (Türk et al., 1996; Nakano et al., 1999).

Sourdough fermentation drops dough pH through lactic and acetic acid production, which drives endogenous phytase into its active range; a moderate drop from about 6.0 to 5.5 is enough (Leenhardt et al., 2005; Reale et al., 2007). Reported phytate degradation in optimised sourdough reaches roughly 60 to 90% or more (Lopez et al., 2001; Türk et al., 1996), with measured improvements in iron, zinc, and magnesium bioaccessibility (Lopez et al., 2003; Hoppe et al., 2025). The evidence is uneven: magnesium solubility rises in vitro, rats absorb more magnesium, iron and zinc (Lopez et al., 2003), and women absorbed up to three times more iron from a sourdough rye meal than from a scalded-flour rye bread (Hoppe et al., 2025). But the human evidence is for single-meal absorption only; long-term trials have not improved iron status, and in one the low-phytate sourdough group’s ferritin fell (Nikolaou et al., 2026).

Contested

How much phytate a plain yeast dough breaks down. The figure usually quoted against sourdough is 20 to 40%, and short, straight-dough processes do land there: 38% in Lopez et al. (2001), and about 40% even in unleavened, unacidified whole-wheat dough in Leenhardt et al. (2005). But Türk et al. (1996) measured 64% in a long-proofed wholemeal yeast bread with no additives, and Nor Qhairul Izzreen et al. (2017) saw 60 to 70% during a 19-minute mix alone, rising to 70 to 90% after fermentation, partly with phytase-active yeast strains. The yeast-dough figure depends on flour phytase, particle size, time, and temperature, and a long-fermented wholemeal yeast bread can close much of the gap. Sourdough's advantage is real; it is largest against short, white-flour yeast processes.

Fructan reduction is well supported and clinically relevant. Wheat contains fructans, a fermentable oligosaccharide and a leading trigger of gas, bloating, and pain in irritable bowel syndrome (Van den Houte et al., 2024), and the likely culprit in many people who report gluten sensitivity (Skodje et al., 2018). Sourdough bacteria and yeast consume fructans during fermentation, cutting them by roughly two thirds in conventional sourdoughs, and with suitable strains and flours fermentation can lower a bread’s FODMAP load below the low-FODMAP threshold (Loponen & Gänzle, 2018; Borowska et al., 2023; Wittwer et al., 2026). Fermentation length alone does not guarantee it: wholemeal wheat and rye breads stayed high-FODMAP regardless of proofing time in one survey (Schmidt & Sciurba, 2021). This is a plausible, partly demonstrated explanation for why many people who believe they react to wheat tolerate genuine long-fermented sourdough: their trigger may be fructans rather than gluten, though the one blinded wheat trial found no tolerance difference (Laatikainen et al., 2017). The caveat matters commercially, since many breads sold as sourdough are short-fermented or use added yeast, and wholemeal wheat and rye versions in particular can remain high in fructans (Loponen & Gänzle, 2018; Monash University, n.d.).

Glycemic response is modestly supported. Sourdough breads tend to give a lower postprandial glucose response, possibly through their organic acids reducing starch digestibility or inhibiting amylase; the slowed-gastric-emptying explanation is itself disputed (Rizzello et al., 2019). Pooled across 18 trials against industrial bread or glucose, the glucose reduction is small and the certainty low to very low (Rolim et al., 2022), and the two most recent systematic reviews call the evidence inconsistent and not convincing (Ribet et al., 2023; Starowicz et al., 2026). Magnitude varies and not every trial is positive.

Two things sourdough is not

It is not probiotic. Baking kills most of the microbes, cutting viable counts by about four orders of magnitude even in the crumb (Zhang et al., 2018), and sourdough bread is neither formulated nor tested to deliver a probiotic dose. The benefits are prebiotic and fermentation-derived, not live culture.

It is not celiac-safe. Long fermentation partially breaks down gluten, which is real, but not to a degree that makes ordinary sourdough safe for people with celiac disease; only engineered fermentations with selected lactobacilli and fungal proteases have reached the gluten-free range (Rizzello et al., 2007; Barre et al., 2023). The gluten-free threshold remains below 20 parts per million (21 C.F.R. § 101.91, 2020), and the results above needed selected strains and added enzymes; ordinary sourdough fermentation does not get wheat bread there (Rizzello et al., 2007; Barre et al., 2023). Under the 2020 US rule for fermented foods, a wheat sourdough cannot be labelled gluten-free even if a test came in under that line, because the food must be gluten-free before fermentation begins.

Acrylamide

Acrylamide is a process contaminant formed above about 250 °F (120 °C) as a branch of the Maillard reaction, from the amino acid asparagine reacting with reducing sugars (Mottram et al., 2002; EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain, 2015). It forms in bread crust, cookies, crackers, and toast, and the darker the crust, the more of it there is (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2016).

It is a rodent carcinogen and a neurotoxin at high doses, classified by IARC as probably carcinogenic to humans, Group 2A (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1994). Human dietary epidemiology is inconsistent and has not clearly demonstrated cancer risk at dietary exposures (Pelucchi et al., 2015; EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain, 2015), but regulators advise keeping intake low: the European Union requires food businesses to hold levels “as low as reasonably achievable” (European Commission, 2017), and the Codex code of practice sets out how to reduce formation (Codex Alimentarius Commission, 2009), while the US guidance is non-binding and asks manufacturers to reduce where feasible (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2016).

Mitigation in baking is straightforward: bake to golden rather than dark brown, reduce time or temperature where you can, prefer lower-reducing-sugar formulations, and give a yeasted dough a full fermentation, since yeast consumes free asparagine; most of it is gone after two hours, and acrylamide falls with fermentation time (Fredriksson et al., 2004; Claus et al., 2008; Katsaiti & Granby, 2016). Sourdough fermentation does not deplete asparagine as efficiently and can blunt the yeast’s uptake, so a sourdough loaf is not automatically lower in acrylamide (Fredriksson et al., 2004). Industrially, the enzyme asparaginase strips asparagine before baking (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2016). The chemistry is well characterised; the human dietary risk is uncertain, and the appropriate framing is precautionary rather than alarmist.

The evidence ledger

A consolidated, honest accounting, which is what a reference owes its readers.

Whole grain and mortalityDose-response association with lower CVD, cancer, and all-cause mortality (Aune et al., 2016)Strong association · moderate causal magnitude
Sourdough and phytateAcidity activates endogenous phytase and degrades phytate (Leenhardt et al., 2005); single-meal iron absorption rises, but long-term iron status has not improved (Nikolaou et al., 2026)Strong on phytate · weak on mineral status
Beta-glucan and LDLOat and barley beta-glucan lowers LDL cholesterol at about 3 g/day (Whitehead et al., 2014; EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies, 2011)Strong
Folic acid fortificationSharply reduced neural tube defects (Williams et al., 2015; Atta et al., 2016)Strong
Acrylamide chemistryAsparagine plus reducing sugars; lighter baking and full yeast fermentation are effective mitigation (sourdough less so)Strong on chemistry · uncertain on dietary risk
Sourdough and FODMAPsFructan degradation is real; improved tolerance in IBS is plausible but the one blinded wheat trial was negative (Laatikainen et al., 2017)Moderate
Sourdough and glycemiaOrganic acids lower glycemic response; small pooled effect, low certainty (Rolim et al., 2022)Low to moderate
Stone-ground superiorityLittle difference for whole flour; sifted stone flour keeps more bran and germ than roller white (Cappelli et al., 2020)Moderate
"Ancient wheats are gluten-friendlier"Small, often industry-linked trials; einkorn, emmer, spelt and khorasan all contain celiac-active gluten (Brouns et al., 2022; Šuligoj et al., 2013). Teff, millet, sorghum, quinoa and amaranth, sometimes also called ancient grains, contain no gluten, but bought unlabelled they are often contaminated with wheat, barley or rye in milling, so for celiac disease use products labelled gluten-free (21 C.F.R. § 101.91, 2020; Thompson et al., 2010).Weak · not safe for celiacs
"Modern wheat is more toxic"Gluten content roughly stable over a century (Kasarda, 2013; Pronin et al., 2020); rising celiac prevalence reflects better detection and a real increase of unknown cause, not a change in the gluten content of wheat varieties; changes in how much wheat and added gluten people eat remain open questions (Kasarda, 2013; Lohi et al., 2007; Rubio-Tapia et al., 2009; King et al., 2020)Not supported
NCGS as a gluten diseaseTrigger is often fructans (Skodje et al., 2018) or, on mechanistic evidence, amylase-trypsin inhibitors (Zevallos et al., 2017); nocebo effects are large (Molina-Infante & Carroccio, 2017)Contested · "wheat sensitivity" is more defensible
Sourdough as probioticBaking inactivates the microbes (Zhang et al., 2018)Not supported
Gluten-free for the general populationNo good evidence of benefit; potential nutritional downsides (Lebwohl et al., 2017; Niland & Cash, 2018)Weak
"Finely milled whole wheat is low-GI"Intactness drives the benefit, not the whole-grain label (Edwards et al., 2015)False

The throughline: the nutrition of baked goods is governed by three physical facts. Which fractions of the kernel survive milling, since bran and germ carry both the nutrition and the spoilage. How finely the grain is ground, since intactness governs glycemic response. And how the dough is fermented, since acid and enzymes govern mineral availability, fructans, and glycemia. Get those three right and you have improved the nutrition of bread more than any additive can.

Related in this library: Ingredient Science · Bread Atlas & Sourdough · Dietary & Alternative Baking · History of Baking

References

  • AACC International. (1999). Whole grain definition. Cereals & Grains Association. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/resources/definitions/Pages/WholeGrain.aspx
  • Thompson, T., Lee, A. R., & Grace, T. (2010). Gluten contamination of grains, seeds, and flours in the United States: A pilot study. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 110(6), 937–940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2010.03.014
  • Åberg, S., Mann, J., Neumann, S., Ross, A. B., & Reynolds, A. N. (2020). Whole-grain processing and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial. Diabetes Care, 43(8), 1717–1723. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-0263
  • Atkinson, F. S., Foster-Powell, K., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2008). International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care, 31(12), 2281–2283. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc08-1239
  • Atta, C. A. M., Fiest, K. M., Frolkis, A. D., Jette, N., Pringsheim, T., St Germaine-Smith, C., Rajapakse, T., Kaplan, G. G., & Metcalfe, A. (2016). Global birth prevalence of spina bifida by folic acid fortification status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 106(1), e24–e34. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302902
  • Aune, D., Keum, N., Giovannucci, E., Fadnes, L. T., Boffetta, P., Greenwood, D. C., Tonstad, S., Vatten, L. J., Riboli, E., & Norat, T. (2016). Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and all cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ, 353, i2716. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2716
  • Aune, D., Norat, T., Romundstad, P., & Vatten, L. J. (2013). Whole grain and refined grain consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies. European Journal of Epidemiology, 28(11), 845–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-013-9852-5
  • Barre, A., Benoist, H., & Rougé, P. (2023). Impacts of sourdough technology on the availability of celiac peptides from wheat α- and γ-gliadins: In silico approach. Allergies, 3(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/allergies3010004
  • Borowska, M., Ispiryan, L., Neylon, E., Sahin, A. W., Murphy, C. P., Zannini, E., Arendt, E. K., & Coffey, A. (2023). Screening and application of novel homofermentative lactic acid bacteria results in low-FODMAP whole-wheat bread. Fermentation, 9(4), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9040336
  • Boz, H. (2015). Ferulic acid in cereals - a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 33(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17221/401/2014-CJFS
  • Brouns, F., Geisslitz, S., Guzman, C., Ikeda, T. M., Arzani, A., Latella, G., Simsek, S., Colomba, M., Gregorini, A., Zevallos, V., Lullien‐Pellerin, V., Jonkers, D., & Shewry, P. R. (2022). Do ancient wheats contain less gluten than modern bread wheat, in favour of better health? Nutrition Bulletin, 47(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12551
  • Brouns, F., Hemery, Y., Price, R., & Anson, N. M. (2012). Wheat aleurone: Separation, composition, health aspects, and potential food use. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 52(6), 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.589540
  • Cappelli, A., Oliva, N., & Cini, E. (2020). Stone milling versus roller milling: A systematic review of the effects on wheat flour quality, dough rheology, and bread characteristics. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 97, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.008
  • Carcea, M., Turfani, V., Narducci, V., Melloni, S., Galli, V., & Tullio, V. (2019). Stone milling versus roller milling in soft wheat: Influence on products composition. Foods, 9(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9010003
  • Claus, A., Mongili, M., Weisz, G., Schieber, A., & Carle, R. (2008). Impact of formulation and technological factors on the acrylamide content of wheat bread and bread rolls. Journal of Cereal Science, 47(3), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.011
  • Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2009). Code of practice for the reduction of acrylamide in foods (CXC 67-2009). FAO/WHO. https://codex.fao.org/restapi/searchstandard/CXC_067e.pdf?lang=en&id=436
  • Doblado-Maldonado, A. F., Pike, O. A., Sweley, J. C., & Rose, D. J. (2012). Key issues and challenges in whole wheat flour milling and storage. Journal of Cereal Science, 56(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2012.02.015
  • Edwards, C. H., Grundy, M. M., Grassby, T., Vasilopoulou, D., Frost, G. S., Butterworth, P. J., Berry, S. E., Sanderson, J., & Ellis, P. R. (2015). Manipulation of starch bioaccessibility in wheat endosperm to regulate starch digestion, postprandial glycemia, insulinemia, and gut hormone responses: a randomized controlled trial in healthy ileostomy participants. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 102(4), 791–800. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.106203
  • EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. (2011). Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to beta-glucans from oats and barley and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations. EFSA Journal, 9(6), 2207. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2207
  • EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain. (2015). Scientific opinion on acrylamide in food. EFSA Journal, 13(6), 4104. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4104
  • Englyst, K. N., Vinoy, S., Englyst, H. N., & Lang, V. (2003). Glycaemic index of cereal products explained by their content of rapidly and slowly available glucose. British Journal of Nutrition, 89(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2002786
  • European Commission. (2017). Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2158 establishing mitigation measures and benchmark levels for the reduction of the presence of acrylamide in food. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304, 24–44. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/2158/oj
  • Fang, X., Wang, K., Han, D., He, X., Wei, J., Zhao, L., Imam, M. U., Ping, Z., Li, Y., Xu, Y., Min, J., & Wang, F. (2016). Dietary magnesium intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality: a dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMC Medicine, 14(1), 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0742-z
  • Fredriksson, H., Tallving, J., Rosén, J., & Åman, P. (2004). Fermentation reduces free asparagine in dough and acrylamide content in bread. Cereal Chemistry, 81(5), 650–653. https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.2004.81.5.650
  • Ghafoor, K., Özcan, M. M., Al-Juhaimi, F., Babiker, E. E., Sarker, Z. I., Ahmed, I. A. M., & Ahmed, M. A. (2017). Nutritional composition, extraction, and utilization of wheat germ oil: A review. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 119(7), 1600160. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201600160
  • Ghanbari-Gohari, F., Mousavi, S. M., & Esmaillzadeh, A. (2022). Consumption of whole grains and risk of type 2 diabetes: A comprehensive systematic review and dose–response meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. Food Science & Nutrition, 10(6), 1950–1960. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.2811
  • Gluten-free labeling of food, 21 C.F.R. § 101.91 (2020). https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-B/part-101/subpart-F/section-101.91
  • Han, H. M., & Koh, B. (2011). Effect of phenolic acids on the rheological properties and proteins of hard wheat flour dough and bread. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91(13), 2495–2499. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4499
  • Han, W., Ma, S., Li, L., Zheng, X., & Wang, X. (2019). Impact of wheat bran dietary fiber on gluten and gluten-starch microstructure formation in dough. Food Hydrocolloids, 95, 292–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.033
  • Heaton, K., Marcus, S., Emmett, P., & Bolton, C. (1988). Particle size of wheat, maize, and oat test meals: effects on plasma glucose and insulin responses and on the rate of starch digestion in vitro. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 47(4), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/47.4.675
  • Hemdane, S., Jacobs, P. J., Dornez, E., Verspreet, J., Delcour, J. A., & Courtin, C. M. (2016). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) bran in bread making: A critical review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12176
  • Hoppe, M., Sandberg, A.-S., & Hulthén, L. (2025). Influence of sourdough fermentation-induced dephytinization on iron absorption from whole grain rye bread–double-isotope crossover and single-blind absorption studies. Nutrients, 17(24), 3891. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243891
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer. (1994). Acrylamide. In Some industrial chemicals (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 60, pp. 389–433). IARC. https://publications.iarc.fr/78
  • Jones, J. M., Adams, J., Harriman, C., Miller, C., & Van der Kamp, J. W. (2015). Nutritional impacts of different whole grain milling techniques: A review of milling practices and existing data. Cereal Foods World, 60(3), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-60-3-0130
  • Kasarda, D. D. (2013). Can an increase in celiac disease be attributed to an increase in the gluten content of wheat as a consequence of wheat Breeding? Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 61(6), 1155–1159. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf305122s
  • Katsaiti, T., & Granby, K. (2016). Mitigation of the processing contaminant acrylamide in bread by reducing asparagine in the bread dough. Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, 33(9), 1402–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2016.1217068
  • Kelly, S. A., Hartley, L., Loveman, E., Colquitt, J. L., Jones, H. M., Al-Khudairy, L., Clar, C., Germanò, R., Lunn, H. R., Frost, G., & Rees, K. (2017). Whole grain cereals for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(8), CD005051. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005051.pub3
  • King, J. A., Jeong, J., Underwood, F. E., Quan, J., Panaccione, N., Windsor, J. W., Coward, S., deBruyn, J., Ronksley, P. E., Shaheen, A.-A., Quan, H., Godley, J., Veldhuyzen van Zanten, S., Lebwohl, B., Ng, S. C., Ludvigsson, J. F., & Kaplan, G. G. (2020). Incidence of celiac disease is increasing over time: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115(4), 507–525. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000523
  • Laatikainen, R., Koskenpato, J., Hongisto, S.-M., Loponen, J., Poussa, T., Huang, X., Sontag-Strohm, T., Salmenkari, H., & Korpela, R. (2017). Pilot study: Comparison of sourdough wheat bread and yeast-fermented wheat bread in individuals with wheat sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrients, 9(11), 1215. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111215
  • Lebwohl, B., Cao, Y., Zong, G., Hu, F. B., Green, P. H. R., Neugut, A. I., Rimm, E. B., Sampson, L., Dougherty, L. W., Giovannucci, E., Willett, W. C., Sun, Q., & Chan, A. T. (2017). Long term gluten consumption in adults without celiac disease and risk of coronary heart disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ, 357, j1892. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1892
  • Leenhardt, F., Levrat-Verny, M.-A., Chanliaud, E., & Rémésy, C. (2005). Moderate decrease of pH by sourdough fermentation is sufficient to reduce phytate content of whole wheat flour through endogenous phytase activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53(1), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf049193q
  • Lohi, S., Mustalahti, K., Kaukinen, K., Laurila, K., Collin, P., Rissanen, H., Lohi, O., Bravi, E., Gasparin, M., Reunanen, A., & Mäki, M. (2007). Increasing prevalence of coeliac disease over time. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 26(9), 1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03502.x
  • Lopez, H. W., Duclos, V., Coudray, C., Krespine, V., Feillet-Coudray, C., Messager, A., Demigné, C., & Rémésy, C. (2003). Making bread with sourdough improves mineral bioavailability from reconstituted whole wheat flour in rats. Nutrition, 19(6), 524–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(02)01079-1
  • Lopez, H. W., Krespine, V., Guy, C., Messager, A., Demigne, C., & Remesy, C. (2001). Prolonged fermentation of whole wheat sourdough reduces phytate level and increases soluble magnesium. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 49(5), 2657–2662. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf001255z
  • Loponen, J., & Gänzle, M. G. (2018). Use of sourdough in low FODMAP baking. Foods, 7(7), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods7070096
  • Marti, A., Torri, L., Casiraghi, M. C., Franzetti, L., Limbo, S., Morandin, F., Quaglia, L., & Pagani, M. A. (2014). Wheat germ stabilization by heat-treatment or sourdough fermentation: Effects on dough rheology and bread properties. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 59(2), 1100–1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.06.039
  • Mathews, R., & Chu, Y. (2020). Global review of whole grain definitions and health claims. Nutrition Reviews, 78(Suppl. 1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz055
  • Mayer, N., Widderich, N., Scherzinger, M., Bubenheim, P., & Kaltschmitt, M. (2023). Comparison of phosphorus and phytase activity distribution in wheat, rye, barley and oats and their impact on a potential phytate separation. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 16(5), 1076–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-022-02981-3
  • McGee, H. (2004). On food and cooking: The science and lore of the kitchen (rev. ed.). Scribner.
  • Mete, E., Haszard, J., Perry, T., Oey, I., Mann, J., & Te Morenga, L. (2021). Effect of wholegrain flour particle size in bread on glycaemic and insulinaemic response among people with risk factors for type 2 diabetes: A randomised crossover trial. Nutrients, 13(8), 2579. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082579
  • Meziani, S., Nadaud, I., Tasleem-Tahir, A., Nurit, E., Benguella, R., & Branlard, G. (2021). Wheat aleurone layer: A site enriched with nutrients and bioactive molecules with potential nutritional opportunities for breeding. Journal of Cereal Science, 100, 103225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103225
  • Molina-Infante, J., & Carroccio, A. (2017). Suspected nonceliac gluten sensitivity confirmed in few patients after gluten challenge in double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 15(3), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.007
  • Monash University. (n.d.). Sourdough, processing and FODMAPs. Monash FODMAP. https://www.monashfodmap.com/blog/sourdough-processing-fodmaps/
  • Mottram, D. S., Wedzicha, B. L., & Dodson, A. T. (2002). Acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction. Nature, 419(6906), 448–449. https://doi.org/10.1038/419448a
  • Musa-Veloso, K., Poon, T., Harkness, L. S., O'Shea, M., & Chu, Y. (2018). The effects of whole-grain compared with refined wheat, rice, and rye on the postprandial blood glucose response: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 108(4), 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy112
  • Myhrvold, N., & Migoya, F. (2017). Modernist bread. The Cooking Lab.
  • Nakano, T., Joh, T., Tokumoto, E., & Hayakawa, T. (1999). Purification and characterization of phytase from bran of Triticum aestivum L. cv. Nourin #61. Food Science and Technology Research, 5(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.3136/fstr.5.18
  • Nikolaou, A., Assunção, R., Cvetković, B., Fardet, A., Gamero, A., Gandía, M., Mojsova, S., Yilmaz, B., Kütt, M.-L., Santa, D., Chassard, C., Praćer, S., Vergères, G., Karakaya, S., & Syrpas, M. (2026). Effects of sourdough- or regular-bread fermentation, and phytate reduction on iron bioavailability, absorption, and iron status in humans: a systematic review of intervention studies. Frontiers in Nutrition, 13, 1778997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1778997
  • Niland, B., & Cash, B. D. (2018). Health benefits and adverse effects of a gluten-free diet in non-celiac disease patients. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14(2), 82–91. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5866307/
  • Noort, M. W., van Haaster, D., Hemery, Y., Schols, H. A., & Hamer, R. J. (2010). The effect of particle size of wheat bran fractions on bread quality – evidence for fibre–protein interactions. Journal of Cereal Science, 52(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2010.03.003
  • Nor Qhairul Izzreen, M. N., Nuobariene, L., Rasmussen, S. K., Arneborg, N., & Hansen, Å. S. (2017). Changes in phytate content in whole meal wheat dough and bread fermented with phytase‐active yeasts. Cereal Chemistry, 94(6), 922–927. https://doi.org/10.1094/cchem-03-17-0043-r
  • Pelucchi, C., Bosetti, C., Galeone, C., & La Vecchia, C. (2015). Dietary acrylamide and cancer risk: An updated meta‐analysis. International Journal of Cancer, 136(12), 2912–2922. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29339
  • Pradhan, D., Zhao, Y., Ray, A., & Islam, S. (2026). Characterization of HRS wheat stone-milled refined flour: A comparative study with conventional flours. Applied Food Research, 6(1), 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2026.101881
  • Pronin, D., Börner, A., Weber, H., & Scherf, K. A. (2020). Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding from 1891 to 2010 contributed to increasing yield and glutenin contents but decreasing protein and gliadin contents. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68(46), 13247–13256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02815
  • Reale, A., Konietzny, U., Coppola, R., Sorrentino, E., & Greiner, R. (2007). The importance of lactic acid bacteria for phytate degradation during cereal dough fermentation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55(8), 2993–2997. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf063507n
  • Renzetti, S., Theunissen, M., & Horrevorts, K. (2021). A systematic comparison of the intrinsic properties of wheat and oat bran fractions and their effects on dough and bread properties: Elucidation of chemical mechanisms, water binding, and steric hindrance. Foods, 10(10), 2311. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10102311
  • Reynolds, A. N., Mann, J., Elbalshy, M., Mete, E., Robinson, C., Oey, I., Silcock, P., Downes, N., Perry, T., & Te Morenga, L. (2020). Wholegrain particle size influences postprandial glycemia in type 2 diabetes: A randomized crossover study comparing four wholegrain breads. Diabetes Care, 43(2), 476–479. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-1466
  • Reynolds, A., Mann, J., Cummings, J., Winter, N., Mete, E., & Te Morenga, L. (2019). Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The Lancet, 393(10170), 434–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9
  • Ribet, L., Dessalles, R., Lesens, C., Brusselaers, N., & Durand-Dubief, M. (2023). Nutritional benefits of sourdoughs: A systematic review. Advances in Nutrition, 14(1), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2022.10.003
  • Rizzello, C. G., De Angelis, M., Di Cagno, R., Camarca, A., Silano, M., Losito, I., De Vincenzi, M., De Bari, M. D., Palmisano, F., Maurano, F., Gianfrani, C., & Gobbetti, M. (2007). Highly efficient gluten degradation by lactobacilli and fungal proteases during food processing: New perspectives for celiac disease. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73(14), 4499–4507. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00260-07
  • Rizzello, C. G., Portincasa, P., Montemurro, M., Di Palo, D. M., Lorusso, M. P., De Angelis, M., Bonfrate, L., Genot, B., & Gobbetti, M. (2019). Sourdough fermented breads are more digestible than those started with Baker’s yeast alone: An in vivo challenge dissecting distinct gastrointestinal responses. Nutrients, 11(12), 2954. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122954
  • Rolim, M. E., Fortes, M. I., Von Frankenberg, A., & Duarte, C. K. (2022). Consumption of sourdough bread and changes in the glycemic control and satiety: A systematic review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 64(3), 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2108756
  • Rubio-Tapia, A., Kyle, R. A., Kaplan, E. L., Johnson, D. R., Page, W., Erdtmann, F., Brantner, T. L., Kim, W. R., Phelps, T. K., Lahr, B. D., Zinsmeister, A. R., Melton, L. J., & Murray, J. A. (2009). Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology, 137(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.03.059
  • Schlemmer, U., Frølich, W., Prieto, R. M., & Grases, F. (2009). Phytate in foods and significance for humans: Food sources, intake, processing, bioavailability, protective role and analysis. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, 53(S2), S330–S375. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.200900099
  • Schmidt, M., & Sciurba, E. (2021). Determination of FODMAP contents of common wheat and rye breads and the effects of processing on the final contents. European Food Research and Technology, 247(2), 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-020-03633-6
  • Skodje, G. I., Sarna, V. K., Minelle, I. H., Rolfsen, K. L., Muir, J. G., Gibson, P. R., Veierød, M. B., Henriksen, C., & Lundin, K. E. (2018). Fructan, rather than gluten, induces symptoms in patients with self-reported non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology, 154(3), 529–539.e2. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.040
  • Slavin, J. L., Jacobs, D., Marquart, L., & Wiemer, K. (2001). The role of whole grains in disease prevention. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 101(7), 780–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(01)00194-8
  • Starowicz, M., Domínguez-Soberanes, J., Garcia-Gutierrez, E., Arslan-Tontul, S., Burton-Pimentel, K. J., Vidović, B., Moreno-Indias, I., Karagöz, M. F., Prvulović, M., Simeunovic, V., Ruiz-Limón, P., Gutiérrez-Repiso, C., Pajalic, Z., Yerlikaya, O., Esatbeyoglu, T., Yilmaz, B., Mantzouridou, F., Chassard, C., Pracer, S., …, & Louis, S. (2026). Effects of sourdough and yeast fermented breads consumption on glycaemia in healthy populations: a systematic review. Frontiers in Nutrition, 13, 1910648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2026.1910648
  • Šuligoj, T., Gregorini, A., Colomba, M., Ellis, H. J., & Ciclitira, P. J. (2013). Evaluation of the safety of ancient strains of wheat in coeliac disease reveals heterogeneous small intestinal T cell responses suggestive of coeliac toxicity. Clinical Nutrition, 32(6), 1043–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.02.003
  • Tian, W., Zheng, Y., Wang, W., Wang, D., Tilley, M., Zhang, G., He, Z., & Li, Y. (2022). A comprehensive review of wheat phytochemicals: From farm to fork and beyond. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 21(3), 2274–2308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12960
  • Türk, M., Carlsson, N.-G., & Sandberg, A.-S. (1996). Reduction in the levels of phytate during wholemeal bread making; effect of yeast and wheat phytases. Journal of Cereal Science, 23(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1996.0026
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2016). Guidance for industry: Acrylamide in foods. Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-acrylamide-foods
  • Van den Houte, K., Colomier, E., Routhiaux, K., Mariën, Z., Schol, J., Van den Bergh, J., Vanderstappen, J., Pauwels, N., Joos, A., Arts, J., Caenepeel, P., De Clerck, F., Matthys, C., Meulemans, A., Jones, M., Vanuytsel, T., Carbone, F., & Tack, J. (2024). Efficacy and findings of a blinded randomized reintroduction phase for the low FODMAP diet in irritable bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology, 167(2), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.02.008
  • Wei, C. Y., Zhu, D., & Nyström, L. (2021). Improving wholegrain product quality by selecting lipid-stable wheat varieties. Food Chemistry, 345, 128683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128683
  • Whitehead, A., Beck, E. J., Tosh, S., & Wolever, T. M. (2014). Cholesterol-lowering effects of oat β-glucan: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 100(6), 1413–1421. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.114.086108
  • Whole Grains Council. (2004). Definition of whole grains. Oldways. https://wholegrainscouncil.org/definition-whole-grain
  • Williams, J., Mai, C. T., Mulinare, J., Isenburg, J., Flood, T. J., Ethen, M., Frohnert, B., & Kirby, R. S. (2015). Updated estimates of neural tube defects prevented by mandatory folic acid fortification—United States, 1995–2011. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(1), 1–5. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6401a2.htm
  • Wittwer, A. E., Li, J. A., & Howell, K. (2026). Applying deconstructed sourdough communities and fermentation parameters to low-FODMAP wheat bread production. European Food Research and Technology, 252(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-025-04942-4
  • Zevallos, V. F., Raker, V., Tenzer, S., Jimenez-Calvente, C., Ashfaq-Khan, M., Rüssel, N., Pickert, G., Schild, H., Steinbrink, K., & Schuppan, D. (2017). Nutritional wheat amylase-trypsin inhibitors promote intestinal inflammation via activation of myeloid cells. Gastroenterology, 152(5), 1100–1113.e12. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.006
  • Zhang, L., Taal, M. A., Boom, R. M., Chen, X. D., & Schutyser, M. A. (2018). Effect of baking conditions and storage on the viability of Lactobacillus plantarum supplemented to bread. LWT, 87, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.09.005

Print references: Modernist Bread (Myhrvold & Migoya, 2017); McGee, On Food and Cooking (2004); Aune et al., BMJ (2016); Reynolds et al., The Lancet (2019); Cappelli et al., Trends in Food Science & Technology (2020).